Two employees work the same hours, deliver equally high-quality results, and demonstrate dedication to their roles. The only difference? One works in the office, while the other works remotely. Yet, the in-office employee reaps greater recognition, more opportunities, and faster career advancement. This scenario exposes proximity bias - a harmful force undermining modern workplace dynamics.
As hybrid workplaces and remote work models solidify as the new standard, a concerning pattern has emerged: most executives acknowledge valuing the contributions of in-office employees over those of their remote counterparts. These bias are making us face tough questions about fairness and equality in the changing world of work.
TL;DR:
-
Proximity bias occurs when in-office employees are favored over remote workers, despite equal contributions.
-
In-office efforts are often noticed more than remote work, leading to unequal recognition and opportunities.
-
Remote workers are frequently sidelined in bonuses and rewards, creating a gap in compensation.
-
Remote employees are often seen as more replaceable due to their physical absence, undervaluing their contributions.
-
Proximity bias can harm employee morale, leading to disengagement and lower productivity.
-
Hybrid work models are becoming the norm, with many employees preferring a mix of remote and office work.
-
Technology is crucial in bridging the gap, offering tools to ensure equal participation, collaboration, and scheduling.
-
Combating proximity bias requires clear performance metrics, inclusive meetings, and continuous feedback to create fair opportunities for all employees.
Proximity Bias Explained
Proximity bias refers to the natural human tendency to give preferential treatment to people who are physically closer to us. In the workplace context, it manifests as managers and leaders favoring employees they see in the office over those working remotely, regardless of actual performance or contribution levels. In hybrid workplaces, where employees split their time between remote and in-office work, this bias can be particularly pronounced. Think of it as the workplace equivalent of “out of sight, out of mind” – except the consequences can significantly impact careers and organizational success.
Here are the key characteristics that define proximity bias in professional settings:
-
Unconscious preference for face-to-face interactions
-
Tendency to assign higher value to visible work
-
Greater trust in employees who are physically present
-
Increased likelihood of including in-person workers in important decisions and project assignments
-
Better access to opportunities and resources for office-based employees
When leaders make decisions based on physical presence rather than actual performance metrics, they risk overlooking valuable contributions from remote team members and potentially losing top talent who feel undervalued simply because they work from different locations.
Proximity Bias Versus Other Types of Workplace Bias
Proximity bias is a uniquely modern issue that has emerged with the rise of remote work. Unlike traditional biases rooted in demographic factors or personal relationships, proximity bias concerns physical presence and its perceived link to work quality and commitment.
Key differences between proximity bias and other workplace biases:
-
Scope: Proximity bias impacts anyone working remotely, regardless of demographics or relationships.
-
Nature: Unlike demographic biases, proximity bias fluctuates with work arrangements and often lacks clear legal or policy guidelines.
-
Focus: While visibility bias concerns how apparent work is, proximity bias centers on being physically present.
This bias often arises from practical limitations in evaluating team members rather than deep-seated prejudice. However, it can still compound with other biases, creating added disadvantages for underrepresented remote workers. Addressing proximity bias requires a shift in measuring productivity and value contributions in modern workplaces.
Real-World Examples of Proximity Bias in the Workplace
Here are some eye-opening examples of proximity bias in the workplace. The real-world data reveals how being physically present still impacts opportunities and career growth.
96% of Executives Notice In-Office Efforts More
A staggering 96% of executives admit they notice in-office efforts more than remote work, revealing a clear proximity bias in recognizing employee contributions. This stark statistic underscores how deeply ingrained the "seeing is believing" mindset remains in leadership. For example, when an in-office employee stays late to complete a project, their dedication is immediately visible and memorable. Meanwhile, a remote worker putting in the same hours might go completely unnoticed.
Remote Employees Are 38% Less Likely to Get Bonuses
Remote employees are 38% less likely to receive bonuses than on-site workers - a stark indicator of how physical presence influences compensation decisions. Despite meeting or exceeding expectations, remote or even hybrid workers are often sidelined in reward systems that favor those who are always physically present. This imbalance raises a critical question: are companies rewarding efforts they can see rather than results that truly matter?
Listen to the WorkplaceWhiz podcast: Should in-office employees receive higher pay and more promotions than their remote colleagues?
67% of Supervisors View Remote Team Members as More Replaceable
The fact that 67% of supervisors see remote employees as more replaceable than in-office employees highlights a deeper problem: managers often confuse visibility with value. Since remote workers aren’t physically present, their contributions are usually harder to notice and may be undervalued. This reflects how outdated management styles can overlook the strengths of remote and hybrid teams, limiting their potential and holding back a more inclusive and effective workplace.
60% Worry Remote Work Erodes Professional Influence
60% of remote employees worry that working from home diminishes their professional influence. This concern stems from having less face-to-face time with decision-makers and missing out on spontaneous interactions that often spark new ideas or open doors to career-advancing opportunities. Without the casual office conversations that can lead to visibility and collaboration, employees that stay remote risk being overlooked for key projects and growth opportunities.
Only 15% of Remote Employees Have Access to Mentorship
Just 15% of remote employees have access to mentorship, revealing a major challenge in supporting their professional growth. This mentorship gap often stems from the lack of informal communication that make building connections and receiving guidance in an office setting easier. Without these opportunities, remote team members face significant disadvantages in developing their skills and advancing their careers.
Remote Workers Are 30% Less Likely to Be Included in Decision-Making Meetings
Studies reveal that remote employees are 30% less likely to be included in decision-making meetings, a disparity significantly affecting their role within the organization. Being excluded from these critical conversations isolates them from their teams and limits their ability to contribute valuable insights and shape key strategies. Over time, this exclusion can diminish their visibility, reduce their influence on important decisions, and hinder their career advancement.
27% of Executives Rely on Visibility Metrics to Assess Productivity
Almost one-third - 27% of executives - rely on visibility metrics, like time spent at a desk or presence in meetings, to evaluate productivity. This approach creates a clear disadvantage for remote employees, whose contributions may not be as easily observed. By prioritizing physical presence over actual results, leaders risk undervaluing remote employees' meaningful work behind the scenes. This reliance on outdated metrics not only skews perceptions of productivity but also discourages flexibility and innovation in how work is performed.
Listen to the WorkplaceWhiz podcast: What's the reason behind poor hybrid work performance?
42% of Managers Admit to Overlooking Remote Employees When Assigning Tasks
Perhaps one of the most concerning examples of proximity bias comes from task allocation. Research shows that 42% of supervisors sometimes forget about remote workers when assigning tasks. This oversight directly impacts career growth opportunities and professional development. Moreover, managers are less likely to assign high-profile, interesting projects or provide development opportunities to remote employees, creating a cycle of reduced visibility and fewer advancement opportunities.
The Negative Impact of Proximity Bias in Hybrid Work Environment
Proximity bias in hybrid workplaces goes beyond mere favoritism. It creates ripple effects that can harm an organization’s health and success. Here’s a closer look at how it affects different areas of work life.
On Employee Morale and Productivity
When remote workers feel overlooked due to proximity bias, their morale often suffers. This can lead to lower job satisfaction and reduced engagement. Over time, the sense of being "out of sight, out of mind" can take a psychological toll, making remote employees feel undervalued and disconnected. As a result, their performance and productivity may decline, creating a cycle where disengagement reinforces the very bias that caused it.
This issue contributes to a larger trend: as of 2024, only 30% of U.S. employees report being actively engaged at work, while 62% are not engaged and 15% are actively disengaged. These figures highlight the widespread sense of disconnection in the workforce, making it all the more urgent to address proximity bias and its impact on employee engagement.
On Professional Relationships and Collaboration
Proximity bias creates hidden divisions between in-office and remote employees, slowly eroding team cohesion. When certain team members consistently receive more attention, recognition, and opportunities solely due to their physical presence, it fosters resentment among remote workers who may feel overlooked and undervalued. Over time, this imbalance can strain relationships and disrupt collaboration, as resentment undermines goodwill within the team. This division often manifests as reduced information sharing, diminished trust, and fragmented communication, making it harder for hybrid teams to work effectively and achieve shared goals.
In Performance Reviews and Promotions
The impact of proximity bias is especially apparent in performance reviews and career advancement opportunities. Remote workers often face disadvantages during review cycles because their contributions are less visible to decision-makers. This bias can result in a two-tiered workforce where career progression depends more on physical presence than actual performance.
This issue is further compounded by perceptions among managers, 64% of whom believe that office workers perform better than their remote counterparts. Such assumptions heavily influence decisions about raises and promotions, leaving remote employees at a significant disadvantage, regardless of their actual contributions or results.
In Decision Making and Meeting Dynamics
The exclusion of remote workers from key decision-making processes is a significant consequence of proximity bias. In hybrid meetings, remote participants are often treated as secondary, with their insights overlooked - a concern shared by approximately 59% of remote workers who worry about being left out of important discussions. This not only limits individual career growth but also prevents organizations from fully leveraging the expertise of their teams. Over time, this dynamic stifles innovation, discourages diverse perspectives, and reinforces a company culture that values physical presence over meaningful contributions.
On Employee Retention
Perhaps the most costly impact of proximity bias is its effect on employee retention. When remote workers consistently feel overlooked and undervalued, they are far more likely to leave for opportunities where their contributions are fully recognized. This turnover disrupts team dynamics, hampers productivity, and places additional burdens on remaining employees who must cover the gaps.
The financial implications for organizations are significant. The average cost to replace an employee ranges from 6 to 9 months of their salary. For example, replacing an employee earning $60,000 annually could cost between $30,000 and $45,000 in recruiting and training expenses alone. Beyond the monetary cost, constant turnover can damage morale and diminish an organization’s ability to build cohesive, high-performing teams. Addressing proximity bias is critical not just for fairness but also for long-term organizational stability and success.
How Can Managers Prevent Proximity Bias in the Workplace?
To combat this widespread challenge in hybrid workplaces, managers must make intentional effort to create an inclusive culture that values everyone in the workplace, regardless of the employee location.
Raise Awareness of Proximity Bias Among Team Leads
The first step in tackling proximity bias is recognizing it exists. Managers must understand how this unconscious preference influences decisions and impacts team dynamics in a hybrid workplace. Regular training sessions and workshops can help leaders identify their biases and create opportunities for fair evaluation across in-office workers and remote team members. By making the invisible bias visible, organizations can foster an equal playing field and improve employee satisfaction, regardless of physical location.
Focus on Results, Not Location
Shifting from presence-based evaluation to results-oriented assessment is essential in the hybrid work model. This approach ensures that all in-person employees, on-site counterparts, or remote team members are assessed fairly based on their contributions rather than their physical location. To support this shift, organizations can implement:
-
Objective performance metrics to evaluate contributions consistently.
-
Regular performance tracking systems to ensure transparency and accountability.
-
Standardized evaluation criteria to create equal opportunities for all employees.
-
Output-based success indicators that focus on results over visibility.
By adopting these strategies, human resource management can foster a more inclusive office environment and flexible work arrangements, ensuring that many employees benefit from fair and unbiased evaluations moving forward.
Hold Frequent Check-Ins With Your Team
Regular, structured communication is key to bridging the remote and hybrid work gap. Schedule consistent one-on-one meetings with all direct reports, ensuring remote employees receive the same attention as on-site workers. These video calls should go beyond work progress, focusing on career development, challenges, mental health, and growth opportunities. By fostering this connection, organizations can create a more inclusive hybrid work model that ensures fewer missed opportunities for those outside the same room.
Make Meetings Inclusive
Transform your meeting culture to ensure equal opportunities for participation, eliminating antiquated assumptions about who contributes most effectively. This approach can help avoid creating fewer opportunities for remote team members compared to on-site employees. A few examples include:
-
Starting meetings by prioritizing input from virtual participants.
-
Leveraging digital collaboration tools to create a level playing field for all attendees.
-
Recording important meetings to accommodate team members in different time zones.
-
Structuring specific opportunities for remote workers to share ideas and feedback.
Build Hybrid Work Schedules Together
Collaborative schedule planning ensures fairness and strengthens team buy-in, creating a structure where the team works efficiently while accommodating hybrid work schedules, whether at home or in the office. Develop flexible arrangements that balance individual needs with organizational goals. Key considerations should include:
-
Core collaboration hours to support effective teamwork across locations.
-
Time zone differences to ensure all members, including those in remote or on-site work setups, can participate.
-
Personal circumstances to promote work-life balance.
-
Team coordination requirements to align goals and maintain productivity.
Create a Knowledge Sharing Culture
Establishing robust knowledge-sharing practices is essential in a hybrid workplace to prevent information silos and ensure remote workers stay connected to organizational knowledge. By fostering inclusive practices, managers can prevent proximity bias and ensure that both remote and in-person employees have equal access to critical information. This can be achieved through:
-
Digital documentation of all important discussions to keep everyone informed.
-
Regular virtual knowledge-sharing sessions to bridge gaps between in-person and remote team members.
-
Accessible online repositories of information for easy reference.
-
Cross-functional virtual networking opportunities to enhance collaboration and reduce preferential treatment toward in-person employees.
Remember that building an inclusive culture is an ongoing process that requires constant attention and adjustment. Regular feedback from all your employees can help refine these approaches and ensure they effectively address proximity bias in your workplace.
Tools and Technologies Playing a Key Role in Addressing Proximity Bias
Technology is key in bridging the gap between remote and in-person employees. With the right tools, managers can enhance collaboration, streamline communication, and ensure equal access to opportunities for all team members.
Hybrid Work Status Calendars for Fair Schedules
In a hybrid work setup, knowing who will be in the office daily is essential to help teams plan better and collaborate smoothly. Understanding where everyone works allows for better scheduling and ensures that remote and in-person employees have equal opportunities to contribute, preventing proximity bias.
YAROOMS hybrid work status calendar helps employees create flexible schedules, balancing remote and in-office work. Employees can easily plan their workdays, choose when to work from home or the office, and book spaces for collaboration. The calendar provides clear visibility for the whole team, making scheduling meetings and aligning resources easier. This helps ensure smooth collaboration and prevents scheduling conflicts.
Virtual Platforms for Equitable Participation in Meetings and Projects
The right virtual platforms can transform how remote workers engage with their teams and contribute to projects. Essential features include:
-
Advanced video conferencing with breakout rooms and participation tracking
-
Digital hand-raising and polling features that give everyone an equal voice
-
Collaborative document editing in real-time
-
Project boards that showcase contributions from all team members
-
Recording capabilities for asynchronous participation
These platforms help ensure that physical distance doesn't translate into professional distance, giving remote workers the same opportunities to shine as their in-office counterparts.
The Continuous Journey Towards Eliminating Proximity Biases
Eliminating proximity bias is not a one-time fix but a continuous process that demands ongoing effort and adaptability. As work environments evolve, organizations must stay proactive by:
-
Continuously updating technological tools
-
Training managers and teams to use collaboration tools effectively
-
Measuring the impact of digital initiatives on remote worker inclusion
-
Adjusting strategies based on feedback
The future of work isn’t just about recognizing proximity bias, it’s about actively eliminating it. Are we genuinely creating environments where success is based on contributions, not physical location? Can technology alone bridge the gap, or does the real change come from our commitment to using these tools effectively? To build stronger, more inclusive teams, we must combine smart tech with a focused effort to address proximity bias.